Sadoista (tai todenn?k?isemmin tuhansista) py?r?ytyksist? pelini alussa kolmessa panoksessa ylitin tiet?m?tt?ni maksimin. Ja muistini mukaan n?m? kolme py?r?ytyst? johtivat vain vaatimattomiin voittoihin (vaikka varmistan t?m?n, koska heid?n verkkosivustojensa vetorekisteri ei toimi minulla). Kaikki muut panokset olivat maksimin sis?ll?, ja suuret voittoni tulivat kaikki maksimin sis?ll? olevista panoksista. T?m?n sanottuani ymm?rr?n, ett? minun olisi pit?nyt tiet?? ehdot ennen pelaamista, mutta kuten valituksessani sanoin, kasinoilla, joissa yleens? pelaan, pelit on ohjelmoitu hylk??m??n maksimin ylitt?v?t panokset, ja oletin naiivisti, ett? sama p?tisi t?h?n. Ymm?rr?n my?s, ett? heid?n ehtojensa mukaan kolme panosta ovat riitt?v? peruste takavarikoida voitot, ja jos tarinassa ei olisi enemp??, en olisi tehnyt valitusta.
Mutta tarinaan liittyy LIS??. Kaksi asiaa:
1.) Poistuessani pelist?, jossa tein nuo kolme vetoa, sain ilmoituksen, joka nimenomaisesti ilmoitti, ett? olin tehnyt vetoja, jotka ylittiv?t maksimin, ja kehotti minua laskemaan panostani seuraavissa vedoissa varojeni s?ilytt?miseksi. Tulkitsen t?m?n ilmoituksen samanlaiseksi suojatoimenpiteeksi kuin muut kasinot, joissa olen pelannut, jotka hylk??v?t maksimin ylitt?v?t vedot. Jos se ei ole turvatoimi pelaajien auttamiseksi, miksi minulla on ilmoitus ollenkaan? Vaikka en saisikaan voittojani, mielest?ni kasinon on oltava vastuussa ristiriitaisten tietojen antamisesta. Se on vastuutonta liiketoimintaa ja ep?kunnioittavaa pelaajiaan kohtaan, jotka antavat heille tuhansia dollareita vuosittain ja pit?v?t heid?n liiketoimintansa pinnalla. Kun sain ilmoituksen, saldoni oli noin 1 000 Kanadan dollarin arvosta noppia, ja se oli voitettu maksimin rajoissa tehdyill? panoksilla kolmea lukuun ottamatta. Saatuaani ilmoituksen noudatin ilmoitusta, ja saamani 3 000 Kanadan dollarin lis?voitot oli 100 % maksimin rajoissa tehdyill? panoksilla. Tied?n n?m? yksityiskohdat. Ne eiv?t poista heid?n oikeuttaan takavarikoida varojani ehtojensa mukaisesti, mutta kun niit? tarkastellaan yhdess? saamani ilmoituksen kanssa, on selv??, ett? heid?n varojensa takavarikointi johtuu siit?, etteiv?t he yksinkertaisesti halua maksaa minulle, eiv?tk? siit?, ett? voitot olisi voitettu tahallisella s??nt?jen vastaisella pelaamisella ja ett? ansaitsen kurinpitotoimet. He eiv?t ansainneet, enk? min? ansaitse.
2.) Koska he takavarikoivat voittoni, minulla oli tappio sill? viikolla. T?t? ei voi kiist??. Se, etteiv?t he anna minulle k?teispalautusta, on vastoin heid?n ohjelmansa ehtoja, ja sen pid?tt?minen voittojeni takavarikoinnin lis?ksi sen j?lkeen, kun on annettu ymm?rt??, ett? pystyn pit?m??n ne, on vain lis?? ep?kunnioitusta. Jos he haluavat sulkea pois bonusrahat, koska kolme vetoa ylitti maksimin, niin olkoon niin, mutta minulla on silti peli ja vedonly?nti tallettamillani varoilla, jotka ovat tappio, josta heill? ei ole mit??n syyt? ev?t? minulta k?teispalautusta.
Of the hundreds (or more likely thousand) spins I made, there were three bets early on in my play where I exceeded the maximum without knowing. And from my recollection these three spins only resulted in modest wins (though I am verify this because their websites bet record is malfunctioning for me). All other bets were within the maximum and my big wins were all on bets within the maximum. With that being said I understand I should have known the terms before playing but like I said in my complaint the casinos I usually play at have their games programmed to reject bets beyond the maximum and I naively assumed it would be the same here. I also understand that per their terms the three bets are enough grounds for them to confiscate the winnings and if there were no more to the story I wouldn't have filed a complaint.
But there IS more to the story. Two things:
1.) upon exiting the game where I made those three bets I received a notification that explicitly alerted me I had made some bets that exceeded the maximum and told me to lower my bet in subsequent wagering in order to maintain my funds. I interpreted this notification as the same sort of safeguard as the other casinos I've played at that reject a bet beyond the maximum.. if it's not a safe guard to help players then why have the notification at all? Even if I don't receive my winnings I feel the casino needs to be held accountable for giving contradictory information. It's irresponsible business practice and disrespectful to their players who give them thousands of dollars yearly and keep their business afloat. When I received that notification my balance was about $1,000 CAD worth of dice and that was won on bets within the maximum except for three. After I received the notification I complied and the additional $3,000 CAD worth of winnings i received was made 100% on bets within the maximum. I know these details Don't remove their ability to confiscate my funds per their terms, but when considered along with the notification I received, it is clear their confiscation of the funds is because they simply do not want to pay me and not because the winnings were won through intentional non-compliant play and that I deserve to be disciplined. They weren't and I do not.
2.) With them confiscating my winnings, I had a loss that week. There's no way this can be disputed. For them to not give me cashback goes against the terms of their program and withholding this on top of confiscating my winnings after making it seem like I'd be able to keep them is doubling down on the disrespect. If they want to exclude the bonus funds because three bets exceeded the maximum then so be it, but I still have the game play and wagering with deposited funds I had made which are a loss that they have no reason to deny me cashback for.
Automaattinen k??nn?s: