Od stotina (ili verovatnije hiljadu) okretaja koje sam napravio, bilo je tri opklade na po?etku moje igre gde sam prema?io maksimum, a da nisam ni znao. I koliko se se?am, ova tri okretaja su rezultirala samo skromnim dobicima (mada sam to potvrdio jer mi evidencija opklada na njihovim veb stranicama ne radi ispravno). Sve ostale opklade su bile unutar maksimuma, a moji veliki dobici su bili na opkladama unutar maksimuma. Uz to re?eno, razumem da sam trebalo da znam uslove pre nego ?to sam igrao, ali kao ?to sam rekao u svojoj ?albi, kazina u kojima obi?no igram imaju svoje igre programirane da odbiju opklade preko maksimuma i naivno sam pretpostavio da ?e i ovde biti isto. Tako?e razumem da su, prema njihovim uslovima, tri opklade dovoljan razlog da konfiskuju dobitke i da nije bilo vi?e u pri?i, ne bih podneo ?albu.
Ali pri?a JE jo? ne?to. Dve stvari:
1.) Nakon izlaska iz igre u kojoj sam napravio te tri opklade, dobio sam obave?tenje koje me je eksplicitno upozorilo da sam napravio neke opklade koje su prema?ile maksimum i reklo mi je da smanjim svoju opkladu pri naknadnim kla?enjima kako bih sa?uvao svoj novac. Ovo obave?tenje sam protuma?io kao istu vrstu za?tite kao i drugi kazina u kojima sam igrao, a koji odbijaju opklade preko maksimuma.. ako to nije za?tita koja poma?e igra?ima, za?to onda uop?te postoji obave?tenje? ?ak i ako ne dobijem svoje dobitke, smatram da kazino treba da bude odgovoran za davanje kontradiktornih informacija. To je neodgovorna poslovna praksa i nepo?tovanje prema njihovim igra?ima koji im daju hiljade dolara godi?nje i odr?avaju njihov posao. Kada sam dobio to obave?tenje, moj saldo je bio oko 1.000 kanadskih dolara u kockicama, a to je osvojeno na opkladama unutar maksimuma, osim na tri. Nakon ?to sam dobio obave?tenje, postupio sam u skladu sa uputstvima i dodatnih 3.000 kanadskih dolara dobitaka koje sam dobio je ostvareno 100% na opkladama unutar maksimuma. Znam ove detalje. Ne uskra?ujte im mogu?nost da mi konfiskuju sredstva pod njihovim uslovima, ali kada se uzme u obzir obave?tenje koje sam primio, jasno je da je njihova konfiskacija sredstava zato ?to jednostavno ne ?ele da mi plate, a ne zato ?to su dobici osvojeni namernom igrom koja nije u skladu sa propisima i da zaslu?ujem da budem ka?njen. Nisu bili, a ni ja ne zaslu?ujem.
2.) Po?to su mi konfiskovali dobitke, te nedelje sam imao gubitak. Nema ?anse da se to ospori. To ?to mi ne vra?aju novac je suprotno uslovima njihovog programa, a zadr?avanje ovog novca pored konfiskacije dobitaka nakon ?to sam predstavio da mogu da ih zadr?im je udvostru?eno nepo?tovanje. Ako ?ele da isklju?e bonus sredstva jer su tri opklade prema?ile maksimum, neka bude tako, ali ja i dalje mogu da igram i kladim se sa deponovanim sredstvima koja sam napravio, ?to je gubitak zbog kojeg nemaju razloga da mi odbiju vra?anje novca.
Of the hundreds (or more likely thousand) spins I made, there were three bets early on in my play where I exceeded the maximum without knowing. And from my recollection these three spins only resulted in modest wins (though I am verify this because their websites bet record is malfunctioning for me). All other bets were within the maximum and my big wins were all on bets within the maximum. With that being said I understand I should have known the terms before playing but like I said in my complaint the casinos I usually play at have their games programmed to reject bets beyond the maximum and I naively assumed it would be the same here. I also understand that per their terms the three bets are enough grounds for them to confiscate the winnings and if there were no more to the story I wouldn't have filed a complaint.
But there IS more to the story. Two things:
1.) upon exiting the game where I made those three bets I received a notification that explicitly alerted me I had made some bets that exceeded the maximum and told me to lower my bet in subsequent wagering in order to maintain my funds. I interpreted this notification as the same sort of safeguard as the other casinos I've played at that reject a bet beyond the maximum.. if it's not a safe guard to help players then why have the notification at all? Even if I don't receive my winnings I feel the casino needs to be held accountable for giving contradictory information. It's irresponsible business practice and disrespectful to their players who give them thousands of dollars yearly and keep their business afloat. When I received that notification my balance was about $1,000 CAD worth of dice and that was won on bets within the maximum except for three. After I received the notification I complied and the additional $3,000 CAD worth of winnings i received was made 100% on bets within the maximum. I know these details Don't remove their ability to confiscate my funds per their terms, but when considered along with the notification I received, it is clear their confiscation of the funds is because they simply do not want to pay me and not because the winnings were won through intentional non-compliant play and that I deserve to be disciplined. They weren't and I do not.
2.) With them confiscating my winnings, I had a loss that week. There's no way this can be disputed. For them to not give me cashback goes against the terms of their program and withholding this on top of confiscating my winnings after making it seem like I'd be able to keep them is doubling down on the disrespect. If they want to exclude the bonus funds because three bets exceeded the maximum then so be it, but I still have the game play and wagering with deposited funds I had made which are a loss that they have no reason to deny me cashback for.
Automatski prevedeno: