Pre 13 nedelja moj mu? je tra?io da se njegov nalog zauvek isklju?i zbog zavisnosti od kockanja (pogledajte snimak ekrana). To bi trebalo da zna?i da ni pod kojim okolnostima kazino nema pravo da pove?a ovo isklju?enje ?ak i ako igra? zatra?i.
Pre 6 nedelja je tra?io da se isklju?enje zaustavi kako bi mogao da pristupi nalogu i dozvolili su mu, bez pitanja. (Pogledajte snimak ekrana)
Od tada je polo?io 1.566,6 funti, ?to je sva njegova u?te?evina. Kazino je imao obavezu da ne otvori ovaj ra?un ponovo kada je tra?io trajno isklju?enje zbog zavisnosti od kockanja, sada je pretrpeo zna?ajan gubitak zbog ovog nemara.
Ovo je napisala moja supruga (koja je advokat), ali ja podnosim tu?bu kao vlasnik ra?una. Verujem da je sve u izjavi ta?no.
Ne dozvoljava mi da u?itavam priloge razgovora, ali molim vas da me obavestite ako treba da vidite dodatne dokaze. Mogu poslati e-mail sa ovim.
13 weeks ago my husband asked for his account to be excluded forever due to a gambling addiction (See screenshot). This should mean that under no circumstance does the casino have a right to uplift this exclusion even if the player asks.
6 weeks ago he asked for the exclusion to stop so he could access the account and they let him, no questions asked. (See screenshot)
Since then, he has deposited £1,566.6 which is all of his savings. The casino had a duty of care to not open this account again when he asked for permanent exclusion due to a gambling addiction, he has now suffered significant loss due to this negligence.
This was written by my wife (who is a solicitor) but I am making the claim as the account holder. I believe everything in statement to be true.
It is not allowing me to upload attachments of the conversations but please let me know if you need to see further evidence. I can send an email with this.
Automatski prevedeno: