Mislim da je to postalo ?e??e tek ove godine. To je obmanjuju?e, za?to pitati tako ne?to kada nije bitno. Ako pi?e trajno, onda to zna?i zauvek. Na primer, pikakasino.com prati ovo. Ja sam samo trajno zatvorio svoj nalog, a za njih trajno zna?i zauvek.
Na?alost, kazinima je dozvoljeno da rade ?ta god ?ele. Imam slu?aj sa boostcasino gde je bio identi?an slu?aj, ali je samo drugoj osobi vra?en novac. Dakle, ne za mene. Zaista ne znam na osnovu ?ega. Ono ?to je tako?e problemati?no jeste to ?to kazina uglavnom ne pristaju da otvore vi?e razloga, na primer za?to ne vra?aju depozite.
Ne vidim nijedan valjan razlog za?to bi kazino trebalo ponovo da otvori trajno zatvoren nalog. Tvrdio bih da u ve?ini slu?ajeva postoji ozbiljan razlog za to. Nije ispravno iskoristiti trenutak kada ?elite da poni?tite to trajno zatvaranje iz hira.
I think it has only become more common this year. That's misleading, why ask something like that when it doesn't matter. If it says permanent, then it means forever. For example, pikakasino.com follows this. I have only closed my account permanently, and for them permanent means forever.
Unfortunately, casinos are allowed to do whatever they want. I have a case with boostcasino where it was an identical case, but only the other person was given a refund. So not for me. I really don't know on what grounds. What's also problematic is that casinos generally don't agree to open up any more reasons, for example why they don't refund deposits.
I don't see any valid reason why a permanently closed account should be reopened by the casino. I would argue that in most cases there is a serious reason behind it. It's not right to take advantage of a moment when you want to reverse that permanent closure on a whim.
Mielest?ni asia on tullut yleisemm?ksi ihan vasta t?m?n vuoden puolella. Tuo siin? onkin harhaanjohtavaa, ett? miksi kysy? tuollaista, kun sill? ei ole merkityst?. Jos sanoo pysyv?, niin silloin se tarkoittaa ikuista. Esimerkiksi pikakasino.com t?t? noudattaakin. Olen sulkenut tilini vain pysyv?sti, ja heille pysyv? on siis ikuinen.
Valitettavasti kasinot saavat tehd? mit? haluavat. Itsell?kin on tapaus boostcasinon kanssa miss? identtinen tapaus, mutta vain toiselle annettiin hyvitys. Itselle siis ei. En tosiaan tied? mill? perustein. Sekin siin? on ongelmallista, ett? kasinot ei yleisesti suostu avaamaan yht??n enemp?? perusteita esim vaikka miksi talletusten palautusta ei omalta osalta tehd?.
En n?e yht??n p?tev?? syyt? miksi pysyv?sti suljetun tilin tulisi avata uudelleen kasinon puolesta. V?it?n, ett? suurimmassa osassa tapauksissa taustalla on jokin vakava syy. Ei ole oikein k?ytt?? hyv?ksi hetke?, kun haluaisitkin hetken mielijohteesta perua tuon pysyv?n sulkemisen.
Automatski prevedeno: