Zdravo,
Voleo bih da ljudima ovo poka?em kao studiju slu?aja.
Moji advokati su upravo podneli zahteve sudu protiv Trink NV zbog kra?e. Kazino je poku?ao da mi ukrade preostali iznos iz apsurdnih razloga vezanih za KYC video snimke. Uputio sam porodi?ne advokate, a Trink NV je odbio da se pravilno anga?uje u skladu sa protokolom pre postupka.
Podneli smo prvi set sudskih papira pre skoro mesec dana. Morate da platite. Me?utim, ta uplata onda ide na teret kazina. Kona?no, posle mesec dana, sud je izdao papire kazinu (advokat mi je poslao imejl pro?log petka).
Trink Nevada sada mora da se anga?uje ili ?e biti doneta presuda zbog izvr?enja. Tada mo?ete da platite tro?kove sprovo?enja.
Hello,
I would like to let people watch this as a case study.
My solicitors have just filed carribiajustice court forms against Trink N.V for theft. The casino attempted to steal my remaining balance due to absurd reasons to do with KYC videos. I instructed family solicitors and Trink N.V refused to engage correctly with pre action protocol.
We filed the first set of court papers nearly a month ago. You do have to pay. However that payment then goes against the casino. Finally after one month the court has issued the papers to the casino (solicitor emailed me last friday).
Trink N.V now have to engage or a default judgement is made. You can then pay for enforcement.