Hej,
Jag skulle vilja l?ta folk se detta som en fallstudie.
Mina advokater har precis l?mnat in blanketter till Carribiajustice Court mot Trink NV f?r st?ld. Kasinot f?rs?kte stj?la mitt ?terst?ende saldo av absurda sk?l som hade att g?ra med KYC-videor. Jag instruerade familjens advokater och Trink NV v?grade att korrekt agera enligt f?rebyggande ?tg?rder.
Vi l?mnade in den f?rsta upps?ttningen domstolshandlingar f?r n?stan en m?nad sedan. Ni m?ste betala. Men den betalningen g?r sedan till kasinot. Slutligen, efter en m?nad, har domstolen utf?rdat handlingarna till kasinot (advokaten mejlade mig f?rra fredagen).
Trink NV m?ste nu ingripa, annars meddelas en tredskodom. Du kan sedan betala f?r verkst?llighet.
Hello,
I would like to let people watch this as a case study.
My solicitors have just filed carribiajustice court forms against Trink N.V for theft. The casino attempted to steal my remaining balance due to absurd reasons to do with KYC videos. I instructed family solicitors and Trink N.V refused to engage correctly with pre action protocol.
We filed the first set of court papers nearly a month ago. You do have to pay. However that payment then goes against the casino. Finally after one month the court has issued the papers to the casino (solicitor emailed me last friday).
Trink N.V now have to engage or a default judgement is made. You can then pay for enforcement.
Automatiskt ?versatt:
