Pa, idu?e nedelje ?emo prisustvovati radnom team-buildingu (?to ?e veoma usporiti na?e svakodnevne zadatke, ali je neophodno da se na?emo i razgovaramo o klju?nim situacijama oko nas), pa ako se ni?ta ne promeni, mo?da ?u poku?ati da saznam neke detalje direktno od svojih kolega.
sada kada ste spomenuli recenzije korisnika, zbog toga i dalje dr?imo korisni?ku ocenu odvojeno od Indeksa bezbednosti; veoma je popularno da se ?podsti?u" povratne informacije korisnika i o?ekuje se pobolj?anje Indeksa uprkos nere?enim ?albama.
Zaista poku?avamo da napravimo razliku izme?u "pravih" recenzija i ostalih, ali kao ?to mo?ete zaklju?iti, to nije tako lako. Ipak, sa stalnim porastom AI botova i sadr?aja generisanog ve?ta?kom inteligencijom oko nas, mo?emo dodati prili?no direktan zahtev za otpremanje korisni?ke recenzije – snimak ekrana koji podr?ava.
napravi?u bele?ku; me?utim, kada na?em dovoljno vremena da pregledam istoriju pregleda kazina, pogleda?u je izbliza. Hvala na zapa?anju.
Well, we'll be attending a working team-building next week (which will very slow our daily tasks, but it is necessary to meet up and discuss key situations around us), so if nothing changes, I may try to find some details directly from my colleagues.
now that you mentioned the user reviews, this is why we still keep the user rating separate from the Safety Index; it is very popular to "boost" user feedback and expect the Index to improve despite unresolved complaints.
We are really trying to distinguish between "real" reviews and the rest, but as you may conclude, it is not that easy. Yet, with the constant rise of AI bots and AI-generated content around us, we may add quite a direct requirement for uploading the user review - supportive screenshot.
I'll make a note; however, once I find enough time to browse the casino review history, I'll give it a closer look. Thank you for the observation.
Automatski prevedeno: