Tja, vi kommer att delta i ett fungerande teambuilding n?sta vecka (vilket kommer att sakta ner v?ra dagliga uppgifter, men det ?r n?dv?ndigt att tr?ffas och diskutera viktiga situationer runt omkring oss), s? om inget f?r?ndras kan jag f?rs?ka hitta n?gra detaljer direkt fr?n mina kollegor.
nu n?r du n?mnde anv?ndarrecensionerna ?r det d?rf?r vi fortfarande h?ller anv?ndarbetyget ?tskilt fr?n s?kerhetsindexet; det ?r mycket popul?rt att "boosta" anv?ndarfeedback och f?rv?nta sig att indexet f?rb?ttras trots ol?sta klagom?l.
Vi f?rs?ker verkligen skilja p? "riktiga" recensioner och resten, men som du kanske kan dra slutsatsen ?r det inte s? l?tt. ?nd?, med den st?ndiga ?kningen av AI-bots och AI-genererat inneh?ll runt omkring oss, kan vi l?gga till ett ganska direkt krav f?r att ladda upp anv?ndarrecensionen - st?djande sk?rmdump.
Jag ska g?ra en anteckning; Men n?r jag v?l hittar tillr?ckligt med tid f?r att bl?ddra igenom historiken f?r kasinorecensionen ska jag titta n?rmare p? den. Tack f?r observationen.
Well, we'll be attending a working team-building next week (which will very slow our daily tasks, but it is necessary to meet up and discuss key situations around us), so if nothing changes, I may try to find some details directly from my colleagues.
now that you mentioned the user reviews, this is why we still keep the user rating separate from the Safety Index; it is very popular to "boost" user feedback and expect the Index to improve despite unresolved complaints.
We are really trying to distinguish between "real" reviews and the rest, but as you may conclude, it is not that easy. Yet, with the constant rise of AI bots and AI-generated content around us, we may add quite a direct requirement for uploading the user review - supportive screenshot.
I'll make a note; however, once I find enough time to browse the casino review history, I'll give it a closer look. Thank you for the observation.
Automatiskt ?versatt: