I ja bih bio prili?no iznena?en, pretpostavljam.
Da budem iskren, aktivno sam se kladio na sport pre oko 18 godina, tako da zami?ljam da su se dana?nje prakse i alati agenta razvili tokom vremena. ?to je jo? va?nije, vidim da je ova situacija veoma sli?na funkciji kazina.
Ako se ne varam, uobi?ajena logika ka?e da iz perspektive kladioni?ara, sni?avanje maksimalne opklade direktno smanjuje ?anse za veliku pobedu kori??enjem sopstvenog pravog novca. Ko bi ulo?io pravi novac pod takvim kvotama?
Iz perspektive bookmarkera: ?ta ?e oni uop?te dobiti od ovoga? Ako iz nekog razloga ne ?ele da ovaj kladioni?ar nastavi da se kladi na njihovoj strani, bilo bi bolje da to objasne i zatvore ra?un kladioni?ara.
Imate li druga?ije mi?ljenje?
I would be quite surpriced too, I reckon.
To be honest, I was actively betting on sports about 18 years ago, so I imagine today's practices and agent tools have developed over time. More importantly, I see this situation very similar to the casino feature.
If I'm not mistaken, the common logic says that from the bettor's perspective, lowering the maximum bet directly lowers the chances to win big with using your own real money. Who would invest real money under such odds?
From the bookmarker's prospective: what are they going to gain from this anyway? If they, for some reason, do not want this bettor to keep betting on their side, it would be better to explain that and close the bettor's account.
Do you have a different opinion?
Automatski prevedeno: