Hej. Utm?rkt artikel, men det finns n?gra f?rtydliganden. Varf?r tror du att volatilitet inte kan uttryckas numeriskt? Varf?r ?r du inte n?jd med standardavvikelse som ett m?tt p? volatilitet? Till exempel anger Thunderkick-leverant?ren i sin dokumentation standardavvikelse som volatilitet, ?ven om spelaren inte kan se denna siffra i sj?lva spelautomaten.
Jag anser att det ?r manipulation att anv?nda ord som "h?g" eller "l?g". L?t oss ocks? skriva om RTP att det ?r h?gt och l?gt, eftersom
RTP f?r spelautomater ?r lite mer komplicerat. Du kan f? m?nga olika vinstkombinationer och vinna m?nga olika multiplar av din insats. P? grund av detta ?r det inte s? enkelt att beskriva spelautomaters RTP med ett nummer, och spelleverant?rer anv?nder bara l?sa beskrivningar som "liten", "medium" och "h?g" f?r sina spelautomater.
Spelets varians kan ocks? beskrivas genom den statistiska f?rdelningen av vinster.
Det ?r viktigt att betona att detta anv?nder ett specifikt numeriskt v?rde, vilket kan anv?ndas f?r att korrekt beskriva volatilitet snarare ?n att f?rlita sig p? subjektiva beskrivningar.
Hello. Excellent article, but there are a few clarifications. Why do you believe volatility cannot be expressed numerically? Why aren't you satisfied with standard deviation as a measure of volatility? For example, Thunderkick provider in their documentation indicates standard deviation as volatility, although the player cannot see this figure in the slot itself.
I believe that using words like 'high' or 'low' is manipulation. Let's also write about RTP that it's high and low, because
The RTP of slots is a bit more complicated. You can hit many various winning combinations and win many different multiples of your bet. Due to this, it's not that simple to describe slot RTP by one number, and game providers only use loose descriptions like "small", "medium", and "high" for their slot machines.
Variance of the game can also be described by the statistical distribution of winnings.
It's important to emphasize that this uses a specific numerical value, which can be used to accurately describe volatility rather than relying on subjective descriptors."
Automatiskt ?versatt: