Jag h?ller med dig om att om casinot var medvetet om n?got problem, vare sig det ?r begr?nsad betalningsleverant?r eller alternativ, ?r det r?ttvisa tillv?gag?ngss?ttet att alltid informera spelarna och f?resl? l?sningar.
D?rf?r tror jag att det ?r avg?rande att klagom?let g?r till den punkt d?r klagom?lshanteraren ?tminstone beg?r en f?rklaring fr?n kasinorepresentanten.
?nnu kan vi bara spekulera i vad de har gjort och varf?r. Men det vore inte den b?sta idén om du fr?gar mig.
Om jag inte har fel s? var detta din f?rsta helt d?liga upplevelse, vilket f?rv?nar mig. F?rhoppningsvis kommer klagom?let ?tminstone hj?lpa dig att f? n?gon form av l?sning!
I agree with you that if the casino was aware of any issue, be it restricted payment provider or option, the fair approach is to always inform the players and suggest solutions.
Therefore, I believe it's crucial for the complaint to advance to the point where the complaint handler, at the very least, requests an explanation from the casino representative.
Just yet, we may only speculate on what they have been doing and why. But that would not be the best idea, if you ask me.
If I am not mistaken, this was your first completely bad experience, which astounds me. Hopefully, the complaint will at least assist you in obtaining some sort of resolution!
Automatiskt ?versatt: