The player from Japan had been accused of money laundering by the casino, and despite submitting documents, he had not received his payment even after six months. The player had claimed to have submitted all required documents, but the casino had deemed them insufficient. We had reached out to the casino for more information, but they declined to share any documents or further details as we were a third-party. Consequently, we were unable to investigate further and had to close the complaint as 'unresolved'. We had advised the player to contact the Gaming Curacao Authority for further assistance.
Spelaren fr?n Japan hade anklagats f?r penningtv?tt av kasinot och trots att han l?mnat in dokument hade han inte f?tt sin betalning ens efter ett halv?r. Spelaren hade p?st?tt sig ha l?mnat in alla n?dv?ndiga dokument, men kasinot hade ansett dem vara otillr?ckliga. Vi hade kontaktat kasinot f?r mer information, men de avb?jde att dela n?gra dokument eller ytterligare detaljer eftersom vi var en tredje part. F?ljaktligen kunde vi inte unders?ka ytterligare och var tvungna att avsluta klagom?let som "ol?st". Vi hade r?det spelaren att kontakta Gaming Curacao Authority f?r ytterligare hj?lp.
Automatiskt ?versatt: