Uz svo du?no po?tovanje, ne menjamo indeks bezbednosti na predvi?anju igra?a.
Verujem da sam to ve? objasnio prvo, potreban nam je neki dokaz, u ovom slu?aju, najverovatnije skup ignorisanih ?albi.
(Nije va? slu?aj , koliko vidim.)
Na osnovu toga, rezultat se mo?e promeniti na osnovu spornog iznosa.
Nije savr?eno, ali u svakoj sistematskoj arhitekturi, matemati?ki izra?unate mere se prikupljaju retroaktivno. Na isti na?in funkcioni?e i za nas.
Zamislite samo kako bi izgledale bezbednosne ocene kada bismo ?eleli da ih promenimo za svako pojedina?no ?predvi?anje" pomenuto na forumu ili u imejlovima. Iako prepoznajem va?u poentu, to je za sada nemogu?e razjasniti.
With all due respect, we do not change the safety index on the player's prediction.
I believe I already explained that first, we need some proof, in this case, most likely a set of ignored complaints.
(Not your case, as far as I see.)
Based on that, the score may be altered based on the disputed amount.
It's not perfect, yet in every systematic architecture, mathematically calculated measures are gathered retroactively. It works the same way for us.
Just imagine how the safety ratings would look if we aimed to change them for every single "prediction" mentioned on the forum or in emails. Even though I recognize your point, it's impossible to work that out for now.
Automatski prevedeno: