Tako to ide. La? za la?ju. Poslao sam poruku Upravi lutrije o ovim najnovijim la?ima i ?albi na finsku licencu i verujem da ?e stvar biti obra?ena vrlo brzo. Tako?e preporu?ujem ?albu na marketing usmeren ka Finskoj i kr?enje za?tite igra?a kako bi dobijanje finske licence postalo nemogu?e za Rosa Parkhila i ostale kriminalce u Vajt Staru .
Dobro! Mislim da je bolesno morati da upla?ujete ako ?elite da vas blokiraju. Tako?e, ako zaista ni ne dobijete upla?eni novac kada zatvorite ra?un. Dakle, u praksi morate da prebacite ovaj depozit, a zatim ga podignete. Dosta se o?ekuje od zavisnika od kockanja... Barem ne mogu da prestanem da igram ako sam ve? po?eo i ima novca. Igra?u dok stanje ne bude 0 evra.
You obviously have your standpoint. I won't oppose you. I'm just sad to see that after everything I explained, you keep saying the same. However, I appreciate your approach. I hope one day you will be ready not to play in casinos at all.
Ali zar nije fer da kazino zahteva depozit za zatvaranje naloga? Tako?e, kada imaju pravilo da gubite sredstva ako zatvorite nalog = to zna?i da ste primorani da igrate sa tim sredstvima.
Kada u stvari ne mo?ete da kreirate nalog u instant kazinu bez uplate depozita, odnosno ne mo?ete da blokirate nalog bez uplate depozita.
It depends on the specific situation—it makes sense, for example, when a player has an active balance yet an unverified account with no previous withdrawals. In such a case, the initial deposit may be necessary.
As I said, however, vulnerable players are not the majority and thus should avoid more dangerous sites, which, in my opinion, include quick- registration casinos, anonymous casinos, purely crypto casinos, or casinos that, for some reason, require a deposit upon registration.
It is the player's choice in the first place.
Well, in this case these casinos only accept registering via Pay n Play, meaning that they require both a deposit BUT also verify the player simultaneously via bank identification, which gives them access to full government information.
This also makes it incredibly easy for the casino to ID these players instantly and prevent depositing, which is the case with most reputable casinos that actually respect responsible gaming policies. Therefore it is not understandable for the casino to make excuses and to even go as far as to blame a Finnish licensing regulation, when such an license neither exists, nor do they have one. None of what I said is an opinion. It's an objective fact. White Star B.V. chooses to ignore and lie to abuse gambling addicts. Denying the fact won't change it when the proof is in the pudding.
If there weren't so many great examples of responsible gaming and blocks that prevent registering then maybe some of what these fraudsters are saying would make sense. But right now what they are doing is nothing but abusive towards addicts.
Saying that vulnerable players should avoid 'more dangerous sites' is like saying an alcoholic should avoid alcohol. Easypeasy, lemon squeezy. Right?
I contacted the Finnish police regarding their behaviour and posing as an entity that's actually licensed in Finland. They informed me they'll investigate the matter thoroughly as well.
And even when they clearly have this "techinal reason" as the reason why they can't block you registering, they could easily take responsibility and deny you from using their sites. What I mean by this is that they could answer that we don't allow you to use any of our casinos. And for example any bets will be voided from now on. At least for me even knowing that would totally make me not want to use their sites anymore.
I wonder how this goes if I would win from their sites. Could they cancel any withdraw based on that I asked to block this casinogroup? I think they could easily do this, and probably that too would be totally allowed.
Casino Guru, as expected, concluded that my complaint is unjustified. I think this, along with the blame Radka set on problem gamblers in this thread goes on to show who's side they are on. It's great that they publicly and openly endorse casinos making up rules that straight up abuse people. Now casino owners know that they have an even greater advantage! I will continue my battle in the local GA group as well as gambling therapy and will be sure to inform people that if they need an unbiased mediator that certainly isn't Casino Guru.
Verovatno ?e mi se desiti ista stvar, da ?e mi ?alba biti odbijena. Nadam se da mo?e? da krene? napred u ?ivotu i da ?e? jednog dana mo?i potpuno da se odrekne? kockanja. Ne dozvoli da ti ne?to sli?no uni?ti ?ivot. ?elim da verujem da postoji karma i da ?e je ovi ljudi koji zara?uju novac iz pogre?nih izvora i dalje ose?ati.
Well, in this case these casinos only accept registering via Pay n Play, meaning that they require both a deposit BUT also verify the player simultaneously via bank identification, which gives them access to full government information.
This also makes it incredibly easy for the casino to ID these players instantly and prevent depositing, which is the case with most reputable casinos that actually respect responsible gaming policies. Therefore it is not understandable for the casino to make excuses and to even go as far as to blame a Finnish licensing regulation, when such an license neither exists, nor do they have one. None of what I said is an opinion. It's an objective fact. White Star B.V. chooses to ignore and lie to abuse gambling addicts. Denying the fact won't change it when the proof is in the pudding.
If there weren't so many great examples of responsible gaming and blocks that prevent registering then maybe some of what these fraudsters are saying would make sense. But right now what they are doing is nothing but abusive towards addicts.
Saying that vulnerable players should avoid 'more dangerous sites' is like saying an alcoholic should avoid alcohol. Easypeasy, lemon squeezy. Right?
I contacted the Finnish police regarding their behaviour and posing as an entity that's actually licensed in Finland. They informed me they'll investigate the matter thoroughly as well.
Well, I really admire your insights, and I have responded to everything of importance in this thread. I'm not familiar with Finnish law or local regulations, so I feel it is not a beneficial idea to get involved anymore.
But I still hope we all agree that the main point is to stay away from casinos. In that regard, I really have nothing else to add further. So, I'm done responding to "lemon squeezing", if you don't mind.
Get well soon, and I hope you can overcome this.
Besplatni profesionalni edukativni kursevi za zaposlene u online kazinima usmereni na najbolje prakse u industriji, pobolj?anje iskustva igra?a i po?ten pristup kockanju.
Inicijativu koju smo pokrenuli s ciljem stvaranja globalnog sistema samoisklju?enja, koji ?e omogu?iti ranjivim igra?ima da blokiraju pristup svim mogu?nostima online kockanja.
